<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monster Mess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iconicionic.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/monster-mess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iconicionic.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/monster-mess/</link>
	<description>The Audacity of Dope</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lindsey</title>
		<link>http://iconicionic.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/monster-mess/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iconicionic.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/monster-mess/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you. And, actually, I really liked the movie up until it showed the monster- even if it didn&#039;t show all of it. I kinda wish the most we had seen was when it jumped up towards the helicopter. 

Have you heard the rumors about a second one? I forget if we&#039;ve discussed this already, but I personally see only two options, both of which probably wouldnt be that good:
1. Another home-video-style movie from a different person with a handheld
2. It gets licensed out into a full-blown Hollywood-CGI feature film, with bad plotlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you. And, actually, I really liked the movie up until it showed the monster- even if it didn&#8217;t show all of it. I kinda wish the most we had seen was when it jumped up towards the helicopter. </p>
<p>Have you heard the rumors about a second one? I forget if we&#8217;ve discussed this already, but I personally see only two options, both of which probably wouldnt be that good:<br />
1. Another home-video-style movie from a different person with a handheld<br />
2. It gets licensed out into a full-blown Hollywood-CGI feature film, with bad plotlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
